youandyoualone: (keen interest)
Anafiel Delaunay de Montreve ([personal profile] youandyoualone) wrote in [community profile] synopsychic2018-02-03 03:02 pm

Regarding Sanctions (Shortly after the Glatisant fight of the Rise Era)

Although I know that clean-up from the battle with the Glatisant and the message gleaned from its remains is likely of the utmost importance as of now--as well as the matter of the unintelligible Familiars and Spirit Companions--I do have some news that I hope will aid in improving the lot of the Adversaries of the earliest era.

Before her vocabulary became limited to a single word, the vixen who attached herself to me instructed me on how I might use Oracular knowledge to glean further knowledge on Sanctions. What I have learned is this:

These Sanctions use the power of existing bonds between people, either the ones doing the Sanctioning or those bonded with the person Sanctioned. As these bonds are real in the Realm of Dreams, they can prevent action just as well as rope or shackles might--although 'tis only acts with intention they can prevent, not accidental acts, for it is the dream of action that they prevent.

They can be entered into willingly and with consent, but unless that consent was explicitly and deliberately part of that Sanction, rescinding consent would not break the Sanction.

After learning this, I wished to know more of how one would break the Sanctions and Fidelite, who was then still in possession of her full vocabulary, advised me to build a Dreamcatcher and have it gather energy in the Questing Country of the earliest era for roughly a week. Fortunately, I was already there after the bridge broke.

Shortly before the battle started, my Dreamcatcher was deemed sufficiently filled by my still-coherent Familiar, and now that the fighting has concluded, I have had time to look within to see what might break the Sanctions. That information was granted to me in a series of three visions:

The first, of bitter and acrimonious arguments between Champions and Oracles, leading to the severing of a bond group, also severing all Sanctions they created.

The second, of a cabal of Adversaries furtively meeting, banding together, forming a fresh bond--overwriting the Sanction with the energy of their alliance.

And the third and most intriguing, of a heavy, metal-hafted mace, light wavering around its head like one reads in reports of desert mirages.
claudiometer: arms crossed, wearing sunglasses (future's so bright I gotta wear shades)

[personal profile] claudiometer 2018-02-04 07:33 pm (UTC)(link)
...Random thought that I'm not sure we're going to have time to try, but.

There are a handful of words in English that are their own opposites. 'Sanction' is one of them. Depending on how you use it, it's either blocking something someone wants to do because you don't approve... or granting them a special exception to the usual rules.

I wonder if you could use the framework of these Sanctions to give someone their power back.
claudiometer: looking at a list (on my to-do list)

[personal profile] claudiometer 2018-02-04 11:13 pm (UTC)(link)
I mean, getting rid of the concept entirely is still the better part of valor, but if someone feels like exploiting the shit out of that loophole...
claudiometer: grinning, text: annoying Gentile (annoying Gentile)

[personal profile] claudiometer 2018-02-05 01:20 am (UTC)(link)
Exactly.

Worst case, we can pass the idea on to some of those Adversaries and they can break the system themselves. Seems suitably sneaky for me.
claudiometer: looking up from a case file (o rly?)

[personal profile] claudiometer 2018-02-05 02:06 am (UTC)(link)
Fair point.
crouching_sin: (mine is an evil smirk)

[personal profile] crouching_sin 2018-02-04 10:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Now there's an idea. Since this place runs on concepts anyway...
claudiometer: holding jars of stuff (weighing options)

[personal profile] claudiometer 2018-02-04 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Exactly. Might be difficult to convince one of those Adversaries to try, but in theory it could be done.
crouching_sin: (you'll be pleadin' while you're bleedin')

[personal profile] crouching_sin 2018-02-05 01:52 am (UTC)(link)
Well now. It so happens that by this place's classification, I am an Adversary. They may be more willing to speak to me than to someone who isn't.
claudiometer: holding sunglasses (deal with it dot gif)

[personal profile] claudiometer 2018-02-05 02:03 am (UTC)(link)
Go for it, dude. My Adversary days would've culminated in kidnapping a federal agent, way before I got pulled into this.
crouching_sin: (mmm... tasty)

[personal profile] crouching_sin 2018-02-05 02:10 am (UTC)(link)
Oh? Is that all?

I'll see what I can do.
claudiometer: Claud and Joshua wearing their Christmas shirts (ain't no party like a Donovan party)

[personal profile] claudiometer 2018-02-05 02:22 am (UTC)(link)
It got me my brother back, that was all I needed. [Look dude we can't all be planning to kill God in our free time.]

Good luck.
theflyingone: i'm so pretty (look at)

im so glad i added that etymology site to my search bar

[personal profile] theflyingone 2018-02-04 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)
This is a dream land. If you believe in it hard enough, it comes to pass. I should add that the Latin it comes from simply means passing a decree, one way or the other.
claudiometer: with books (research-fu: old school)

niiiiiice

[personal profile] claudiometer 2018-02-04 11:07 pm (UTC)(link)
Huh. Useful tidbit, that one.
theflyingone: find waldo (scholars)

[personal profile] theflyingone 2018-02-04 11:29 pm (UTC)(link)
I am not sure we can play with words quite so much as a scribe, but there it is.

The locals maintain that belief works in this way, and apparently one's status here depends on how much hope they are willing to preserve.

[ He's a little salty about the Champion/Adversary divide. ]
claudiometer: looking up (iiinteresting)

[personal profile] claudiometer 2018-02-04 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Not only by that, but by how they use it.
theflyingone: they took my freakin kidney (down)

[personal profile] theflyingone 2018-02-04 11:56 pm (UTC)(link)
It doesn't account much for circumstance either. There are things I would do in one situation, but not another. Like the Sanctions, which do not respect someone rescinding their consent, it is all or nothing.
claudiometer: sprawled onna couch, text: WILD HEARTED. (wild hearted)

[personal profile] claudiometer 2018-02-05 01:24 am (UTC)(link)
[You and basically all of humanity, Altair.]

The bigger problem with the Sanctions is dropping them on someone who wants no part of them to begin with.
theflyingone: they put this ledge here just for me (viewpoint)

[personal profile] theflyingone 2018-02-05 01:43 am (UTC)(link)
How do we prevent this from happening? Where are these Sanctioners? Failing preventing them from just making another Sanction again, can a spell's existence be undone?
claudiometer: shifty face is shifty (>_>)

[personal profile] claudiometer 2018-02-05 02:02 am (UTC)(link)
You're probably better off asking people who've been prodding that side of things.
theflyingone: find waldo (scholars)

[personal profile] theflyingone 2018-02-05 02:23 am (UTC)(link)
Yes. Infiltrators did not give me much. I thought they would, being from the past, but no luck. I'll try with Investigators. Enough time has passed that maybe someone has turned up something.
claudiometer: holding phone and lookin' dubious (fun with technology)

[personal profile] claudiometer 2018-02-05 02:41 am (UTC)(link)
Maybe.
awondrousplace: (Default)

[personal profile] awondrousplace 2018-02-04 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)
... oh, brilliant, darling!

That would certainly be a way to throw their words back in their faces, wouldn't it?
claudiometer: evil smirk (evil smirk of evil)

[personal profile] claudiometer 2018-02-04 11:05 pm (UTC)(link)
Wouldn't it just.