brokers: (Hmm)
Liara T'Soni ([personal profile] brokers) wrote in [community profile] synopsychic2019-10-05 01:41 pm

and now a word about our sponsors

I have analyzed the structure of the current manifestation of Liminal Space, and can confirm that this Jaunt is being sponsored by three of the Arcana: Emperor, Lovers, and Chariot.

Unless I've missed something significant while reviewing the discussions that took place over the Network while I was absent, this is without precedent, at least within the current iteration of their...game. [There's a hint of distaste in that last word.]

While it is far less important than the impact our interference might have on this universe, the most pressing question that comes to mind with regards to our own status is whether this will remove only the Arcanum whose idiom is least reflected in the outcome from the playing field, or if it will reduce our overall options by two.
seestheworld: (Mercury Aqua Blizzard)

[personal profile] seestheworld 2019-10-05 05:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Emperor might. Chariot also might, although what it considers direct and what everyone else considers direct don't necessarily follow each other. Lovers... I think it depends on her mood and how much you're entertaining her at any given moment.
seestheworld: (Venus Ten Billion Volt Rock 'N' Rouge)

[personal profile] seestheworld 2019-10-05 05:57 pm (UTC)(link)
That too.

I guess Fortune might be kind of chatty? And she's the one who made the rules, so...
Edited 2019-10-05 17:58 (UTC)
seestheworld: (Mercury Aqua Blizzard)

[personal profile] seestheworld 2019-10-07 04:15 am (UTC)(link)
On the plus side, you're probably less likely to piss him off as some.

[Herself included.]
truerevelation: (*24)

[personal profile] truerevelation 2019-10-05 06:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Eh, I'd say it's pretty good at 'direct'. Just not at addin' all the details that might need adding - wouldn't hide shit, but ... y'know. Gotta get to the point.
seestheworld: (Crescent Boomerang)

[personal profile] seestheworld 2019-10-07 04:14 am (UTC)(link)
So... direct in a way that sometimes comes off as cryptic because its nature means it focuses on the point and not the details?
Edited 2019-10-07 04:14 (UTC)
truerevelation: (~01)

[personal profile] truerevelation 2019-10-07 08:47 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, you got it. It ain't gonna, uh, tell you about the forest if you asked about a tree? That sorta thing.
seestheworld: (Mercury Aqua Blizzard)

[personal profile] seestheworld 2019-10-07 11:26 am (UTC)(link)
Because it wouldn't occur to it that you'd need info on the forest... which would come off as cryptic even when it doesn't intend to be.